America’s Neo-Nazi Government in Kiev is a reality.

Senior Citizens Public Square


While recent news reports confirm US support to the two Neo-Nazi parties, CIA support to Ukraine’s OUN dates back to the Cold War era. Acknowledged by historians yet unknown to the American public was Washington’s insidious support of Ukraine OUN Neo-Nazis after World War II as a means of destabilizing the Soviet Union.

This support was an integral part of what was called the “Truman Doctrine” formulated by State Department official George Kennan. A bitter irony, following the defeat of Nazi Germany, the Truman administration (D) instructed US intelligence at the height of the Cold War to ensure the continuation of Nazi Germany’s support to Ukraine’s OUN “Nachtingall battalion”, reshaped and transformed into a subversive guerrilla group under an Anglo-American acronym.

Today Obama administration foster’s a process of escalation and destabilization? The Neo-Nazi mobs had been trained and indoctrinated. Western special forces and mercenaries on contract to NATO and the Pentagon…

View original post 1,263 more words

Posted in Uncategorized

Has Domrose set himself the task of accomplishing what his father could not accomplish in the Second World War and Cold War—the military subordination of Russia?

Senior Citizens Public Square

obama in jail 2

We have the right to ask, says Putin, against whom is the NATO expansion intended? And what happened to the assurances made after the dissolution of the Soviet Union

No sane person could seriously assert that NATO’s missile shield circling Russia is intended to protect the West from Iran.Yet, that is exactly what NATO – the imperial American occupation army in Europe – tells the world.

the chemical weapons attack by western-backed anti-Assad forces which committed the crime, using chemical weapons to serve as a causus belli against President Assad. (admitted even by the UN ) Only the swift action of President Putin avoided a bloodbath in Syria in which NATO would have become willingly involved.

1_official_photo_domroese Comments by the German four-stargeneral, Domrose who is supreme commander of the Allied Joint Force Command, one of Europe’s three NATO units in the operations leadership, amounted to an…

View original post 850 more words

Posted in Uncategorized

Once again the White House wants to do it in a way that bypasses Congress with ammo ban.

The president who promised to fundamentally transform America has been busy fulfilling his promise.

obama cold eyes

Eric Bolling:

First, he started by twisting capitalism into a pretzel. A trillion tax dollars saved his donor pals at Goldman Sachs and his union buddies at General Motors under a “too big to fail” policy yet they blatantly threaten to bankrupt coal companies.

He picked his winners and losers.

The free market was no longer free.

obamacare sign here pelosi.jpg lrg Then he got to work on health care.

President Obama — in an 11th hour backroom deal — strong-armed enough votes to get ObamaCare passed into law.

He had to do it when he did it because within months, he would lose the Democratic majorities he needed to pull off his political coup. And so health care in America was forever changed..

Next up.. President Obama took the laws of immigration and shredded them to suit his liberal friends.


Forget what we the people have to say. It really doesn’t seem to matter anymore..

islam wants world sharia

Then came the one bastian of free speech, and the free flow of information.. the Internet.

Net neutrality is giving big government big control over our Internet..

One FCC commissioner said this of net neutrality:

It’s a “solution that won’t work, to a problem that doesn’t exist.”

That’s from inside the FCC.

GE(NBC) now owning Comcast and Time Warner +. Can control the political content as well.

And now, there’s an idea being floated by the president this week.

One that I think could be the most dangerous of all.

The administration wants to ban sales of certain types of ammunition. And once again the White House wants to do it in a way that bypasses Congress.

Remember, to ban the ammo is a sneaky way to ban the gun.

Folks, the most important rights our founders outlined in the constitution were freedom of speech and freedom of religion.

These are our First Amendment rights.

But in order to protect the First Amendment — the founders were smart they gave us the Second Amendment.

The right to freely bear arms.

We have the Second Amendment to insure the first.

If the president is able to take over our Second Amendment — the way he took over the free market, health care, immigration and the Internet, we will be administering the last rights to our first rights: free speech, religion and liberty.

The fabric of America is being shredded.

But it has to stop at the Second Amendment.

It’s up to us to demand that they keep their hands off our guns..

Or.. we risk it all..

jokes on youobama-biden laugh at americans

Chew on that over the weekend.

Eric Bolling currently serves as co-host of Fox News Channel’s “The Five

Posted in Congress, Constitution, Gun Control | Tagged , , ,

Euthanasia Victims to Face Death by Morphine Injection in America’s Hospitals and Hospices

Senior Citizens Public Square   Over 65? Please watch  this video

these two 3.jpg 5     The Evil One’s

the forgotten ones The Forgotten Ones

Jon Christian Ryter       2010

Dr. Janda was the keynote speaker at a congressional dinner at the Capitol Building in Washington on Friday, July 17, 2010. As he began his prepared speech, he said, “It should be clear that the same warning notice must be placed on the Obamacare Plan as on a pack of cigarettes: Consuming this product will be hazardous to your health.”

“The underlying method of cutting costs throughout the plan is based on rationing and denying care. There is no focus on preventative health care needs whatever. The plan’s method is the most inhumane and unethical approach to cutting costs I can imagine as a physician.”

The rationing of care is implemented through the National Health Care Board according to this plan. This illustrious board ‘will approve or reject treatment based on…

View original post 766 more words

Posted in Uncategorized

Patient’s Merely “product” to be Manipulated by Law to Produce Profits for all of the Special Interests.

Senior Citizens Public Square

large group we wont take it any more

Eblen Carol · Commented on the Center for the Public Integrity

Unfortunately, the elderly/disabled on Medicare/Medicaid have no idea that their social safety net is managed to provide profit for all of the special interests involved —and we, the patients, are on the bottom of the pile and merely “product” to be manipulated by law to produce profits for all of the special interests.

Unless some of the responsible reporters in Big Media and Big Newspapers tell the American people what is going on, we aren’t going to have this discussion about the constitutionality of unilaterally hastening the dealth of the elderly/disabled on Medicare/Medicaid for the fiscal expediency of the special interests, are we?

When both political parties are complicit, the Executive becomes complicit, and nobody wants to rock the boat If we stopped the unsuccessful spending of our Tax dollars. would the under-the-radar involuntary euthanasia of American elderly/disabled citizens…

View original post 777 more words

Posted in Uncategorized

Obama’s Military Coup Purges 197 Officers In Five Years

obama cheves iranianLaughing at us not with us

Obama’s Military Coup Purges 197 Officers In Five Years

sis not join to fight for alqueda 2

Investors Business Daily, Posted 10/29/2013

Defense: What the president calls “my military” is being cleansed of any officer suspected of disloyalty to or disagreement with the administration on matters of policy or force structure, leaving the compliant and fearful.

We recognize President Obama is the commander-in-chief and that throughout history presidents from Lincoln to Truman have seen fit to remove military commanders they view as inadequate or insubordinate. Turnover in the military ranks is normal, and in these times of sequestration and budget cuts the numbers are expected to tick up as force levels shrink and missions change.

Yet what has happened to our officer corps since President Obama took office is viewed in many quarters as unprecedented, baffling and even harmful to our national security posture. We have commented on some of the higher profile cases, such as Gen. Carter Ham. He was relieved as head of U.S. Africa Command after only a year and a half because he disagreed with orders not to mount a rescue mission in response to the Sept. 11, 2012, attack in Benghazi.

Rear Adm. Chuck Gaouette, commander of the John C. Stennis Carrier Strike Group, was relieved in October 2012 for disobeying orders when he sent his group on Sept. 11 to “assist and provide intelligence for” military forces ordered into action by Gen. Ham.

Other removals include the sacking of two nuclear commanders in a single week — Maj. Gen. Michael Carey, head of the 20th Air Force, responsible for the three wings that maintain control of the 450 intercontinental ballistic missiles, and Vice Adm. Tim Giardina, the No. 2 officer at U.S. Strategic Command.

From’s Facebook page comes a list of at least 197 officers that have been relieved of duty by President Obama for a laundry list of reasons and sometimes with no reason given. Stated grounds range from “leaving blast doors on nukes open” to “loss of confidence in command ability” to “mishandling of funds” to “inappropriate relationships” to “gambling with counterfeit chips” to “inappropriate behavior” to “low morale in troops commanded.”

Nine senior commanding generals have been fired by the Obama administration this year, leading to speculation by active and retired members of the military that a purge of its commanders is under way.

Retired U.S. Army Maj. Gen. Paul Vallely, an outspoken critic of the Obama administration, notes how the White House

fails to take action or investigate its own officials but finds it easy to fire military commanders “who have given their lives for their country.” Vallely thinks he knows why this purge is happening.

Obama will not purge a civilian or political appointee because they have bought into Obama’s ideology,” Vallely said. “The White House protects their own. That’s why they stalled on the investigation into Fast and Furious, Benghazi and ObamaCare. He’s intentionally weakening and gutting our military, Pentagon and reducing us as a superpower, and anyone in the ranks who disagrees or speaks out is being purged.”

Another senior retired general told TheBlaze on the condition of anonymity, because he still provide services to the government and fears possible retribution, that “they’re using the opportunity of the shrinkage of the military to get rid of people that don’t agree with them or do not toe the party line. Remember, as (former White House chief of staff) Rahm Emanuel said, never waste a crisis.”

in contrast umbrellaFor President Obama, the military of a once-feared superpower is an anachronistic vestige of an America whose exceptionalism and world leadership require repeated apologies. It must be gutted and fundamentally transformed into a force wearing gender-neutral headgear only useful for holding the presidential umbrella when it rains. It is to be “his” military and used only for “his” purposes.


jokes on you

Source: Combined From Truth and Action & Before its News

Since assuming office, President Obama has weakened America both domestically and abroad by emboldening U.S. enemies and tacitly supporting Muslim Brotherhood revolutions that have empowered Islamic radicals, charges a new book.

In “Impeachable Offenses: The Case to Remove Barack Obama from Office,” New York Times bestselling authors Aaron Klein and Brenda J. Elliott demonstrate that Obama’s policies have been helping to install Muslim Brotherhood-friendly regimes to the detriment of U.S. national security and world stability.

Obama’s policies are installing political Islam throughout the Middle East and North Africa in a tidal wave of change already reaping disastrous results for those regions as well as for U.S. interests there,” write Klein and Elliott.

The authors compare Obama’s actions to the policies of Jimmy Carter, which weakened the secular Shah’s regime in Iran, arguably ushering in a Shiite Islamic revolution that continues to this day to support and carry out acts of terrorism worldwide.

Aaron Klein’s “Impeachable Offenses: The Case to Remove Barack Obama from Office” is available now, autographed, at WND’s Superstore

Klein and Elliott spotlight the central role Obama played in the downfall of U.S. ally Hosni Mubarak, citing information that indicates elements of the anti-Mubarak uprising in 2011, particularly political aspects, were being coordinated with the U.S.

“Impeachable Offenses” presents new information the Obama administration worked behind the scenes with the Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood to facilitate a transfer of power after Mubarak’s resignation.

Islamic caliphate?

Mubarak was only the beginning, write Klein and Elliott. Obama’s support for a U.S. ally’s ouster and replacement with radical Islamic elements would be repeated numerous times in the Middle East and North Africa, to the great detriment of the American war on terror, the authors write.

“Impeachable Offenses” spotlights Obama’s role in the downfall of Tunisian President Zine al-Abidine Ben Ali, who fled Tunisia Jan. 14, 2011. Ben Ali largely was seen as an ally of the West, even working behind the scenes with Israel on occasion.

Another U.S. ally forced to step down after mass protests was Yemen’s president Ali Abdullah Saleh, who was considered a crucial ally in the U.S. fight against al-Qaida in his country and throughout the Middle East.

Klein and Elliott present evidence Obama was involved in Saleh’s ouster, which brought the Muslim Brotherhood-founded Islah party to rule.

The U.S. similarly has called for the king of Morocco, Mohammed VI, one of the most Western-oriented leaders in North Africa, to open his monarchy to a power-sharing agreement with a new parliament to be voted on by the people.

While the king still retains vast powers, he now shares in a coalition government with the Justice and Development Party, which won a plurality of the vote, the first under the country’s new constitution. The party advocates a society governed by Islam and has been described as an offshoot of the Muslim Brotherhood.

Book makes impeachment case

Klein and Elliott bill their book as a well-documented indictment of Obama based on major alleged violations.

Among the alleged offenses enumerated in the book:

Obamacare not only is unconstitutional but illegally bypasses Congress, infringes on states’ rights and marking an unprecedented and unauthorized expansion of IRS power.

Sidestepping Congress, Obama already has granted largely unreported de facto amnesty to millions of illegal aliens using illicit interagency directives and executive orders.

The Obama administration recklessly endangered the public by releasing from prison criminal illegal aliens at a rate far beyond what is publicly known.

The president’s personal role in the Sept. 11, 2012, Benghazi attack, with new evidence regarding what was transpiring at the U.S. mission prior to the assault – arguably impeachable activities in and of themselves.

Illicit edicts on gun control in addition to the deadly “Fast and Furious” gun-running operation intended, the book shows, to collect fraudulent gun data.

From “fusion centers” to data mining to drones to alarming Department of Homeland Security power grabs, how U.S. citizens are fast arriving at the stage of living under a virtual surveillance regime.

New evidence of rank corruption, cronyism and impeachable offenses related to Obama’s first-term “green” funding adventures.

The illegality of leading a U.S.-NATO military campaign without congressional approval.

Obama has weakened America both domestically and abroad by emboldening enemies, tacitly supporting a Muslim Brotherhood revolution, spurning allies and minimizing the threat of Islamic fundamentalism.

This is Klein and Elliott’s fourth book investigating the Obama administration. The other titles are “Fool Me Twice,” “Red Army” and “The Manchurian President.”

Posted in arab Spring, Benghazi, Big Brother Government | Tagged ,

I scoured [Obama’s autobiography] Dreams from My Father for some expression of reverence, even respect, for the country its author would someday lead,”

future must not belong todawn of the muslim brotherhood

In a rare tell-all book just two years after completing his tenure, the former Israeli ambassador to the U.S. has revealed shocking allegations about the Obama administration’s treatment of Israel.

Among the revelations by former Ambassador Michael Oren, according to accounts by those who read the book: how he initially got the cold-shoulder from then Secretary of State Hillary Clinton after asking to meet her; how State Department staffers cheered as they secretly listened in on a meeting during which the deputy secretary excoriated him over the building of Israeli homes in the West Bank and Jerusalem; and hearing a comment from President Barack Obama to Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu suggesting he had no problem with the then pro-Hamas Islamist Turkish leader Recep Tayyip Erdogan.

Israel aside, Oren wrote in his book Ally: My Journey Across the American-Israeli Divide which comes out next week that he was also alarmed by Obama’s attitude toward America.

obama arms alQada and the behead priest More alarming for me still were Obama’s attitudes towards America. Vainly, I scoured [Obama’s autobiography] Dreams from My Father for some expression of reverence, even respect, for the country its author would someday lead,” Oren wrote, according to an excerpt posted on Breitbart. “Instead, the book criticizes Americans for their capitalism and consumer culture, for despoiling their environment and maintaining antiquated power structures. Traveling abroad, they exhibited ‘ignorance and arrogance’–the very shortcomings the president’s critics assigned to him.”

obama_and_odingaObama_1_nose_in_the_air_cropped Face of a Sociopath

The former ambassador, now a member of Knesset with the centrist Kulanu party that ran against Netanyahu’s Likud, is a historian and supporter of a two-state solution with the Palestinians. One could not accurately characterize him as a right-wing partisan, a point that is feeding the buzz surrounding the book’s release.

A State Department spokesman Wednesday dismissed the former ambassador’s charges and accused him of trying to promote his book. Lies From the State Department

State Department spokesman John Kirby described as “inaccurate and false” Oren’s description in a Wall Street Journal op-ed this week of the damaging role Obama has played in U.S.-Israel relations.

The Washington Free Beacon Wednesday revealed another excerpt of Oren’s memoir that described a uniquely rough battering the former diplomat said he experienced at the State Department.

Oren recalled then Deputy Secretary of State Jim Steinberg in 2010 summoning him for a “furious” lecture demanding a total building freeze in East Jerusalem and the West Bank. Clinton had demanded the same of Netanyahu in an earlier phone call, which Steinberg quoted to Oren

Hillary more of the sameThe former ambassador wrote that he later learned that State Department staffers secretly “listened in on our conversation and cheered” when Steinberg upbraided the diplomat.

US-POLITICS-OBAMA-GOLF How Presidential shocked

The Times of Israel described a passage from the book detailing another apparent battering of the ambassador by the administration.

Oren wrote that Hillary Clinton initially rebuffed a series of requests for a private meeting with the Israeli ambassador.

The Times of Israel reported that Oren recalled that Clinton once “socked” him on the arm when they happened to pass each other and joked that he wasn’t returning her messages. Still, she didn’t meet with him for a while.

In a Wall Street Journal op-ed this week titled “How Obama Abandoned Israel,” he former envoy accused the president of “deliberately” making decisions that resulted in the crisis of relations between the two countries, particularly his promotion of the Palestinian demand for 1967 borders in 2011 and holding secret negotiations in 2014 with Iran “its deadliest enemy” without telling Israel.

John Kirby, the State Department spokesman, said Wednesday that Secretary of State John Kerry had not read Oren’s book but that “It’s the secretary’s view that his account, particularly the account of President Obama’s leadership in the U.S.-Israeli relationship, is absolutely inaccurate and false, and doesn’t reflect what actually happened in the past.” In the past Obama told Muslims you will see what I will do with Israel.

The State Department dismissed the charges as coming from “a politician who’s promoting a book.” Kirby, conveying Kerry’s perspective, asserted that Oren had “limited visibility into many of the private discussions and deliberations that he describes.”

U.S. ambassador to Israel Dan Shapiro told Israel’s Army Radio Wednesday of Oren’s charges, “His account does not reflect the truth. It’s imaginary.” Danny Boy ?Lies vobama-royalty-300x190“Oren is now in a different position; he is a politician and a writer who wants to sell books,” Shapiro added. (And Shapiro is selling progressive propaganda) Obama hatred of Israel is well documented)

The Times of Israel summarized what it called “20 revelations” from Oren’s book.

In one of the episodes, Obama told Netanyahu and his delegation visiting the White House in 2012 that “We could do much worse than have a bunch of Erdogans in the Middle East,” referring to the notoriously anti-Israel Turkish leader.

Oren also asserted that the Obama administration handed Hamas its “greatest-ever strategic victory” during last summer’s war with Israel when U.S. airlines were ordered not to fly to Israel after a rocket landed in proximity of Ben-Gurion International Airport. During the conflict, the administration also “delayed the delivery of munitions needed by the IDF,” Oren wrote.

For Oren, all this has left “aspects of the US-Israeli alliance in tatters.”

The book comes out June 23.

Posted in Uncategorized

Su-24 Russian tactical bomber which approached the Donald Cook carried no bombs or missiles but a container with the Khibiny radio-electronic military system.

who will protect AMERICA

Russia surges ahead in radio-electronic warfare

May 15, 2014 Anton Valagin, Rossiyskaya Gazeta
The crew of the Donald Cook American destroyer was demoralised by the encounter with the Russian bomber SU-24, which used radio-electronic weaponry. With several advanced systems, this is an area that Russia enjoys a distinct tactical edge.

On April 10, the Donald Cook, entered Black Sea waters and within 2 days, the Russian tactical bomber Su-24 “buzzed” the American destroyer. A few media outlets reported that Donald Cook’s crew was demoralised by this encounter and 27 American sailors resigned from the navy. What petrified the American crew so much?

Donald Cook is a 4th generation fleet destroyer of the US Navy. Its key weapon is the Tomahawk cruise missile with flying range up to 2500 km, which can carry nuclear explosives. In standard and striking set-ups the vessel carries 56 or 96 such missiles correspondingly.

The destroyer is equipped with the latest Aegis ballistic missile defense system military. Among other functions it can centralize the air defense forces of all the ships where it is installed in a common network, therefore allowing for tracking and shooting up hundreds of targets at the same time. Four huge standard radar aerials, which can substitute for a few ordinary radars, are located on the sides of the deck erection. About 50 intercept missiles of different classes are installed together with the Tomahawks in the universal launching installations on the bow and by the stern.

The Su-24 Russian tactical bomber which approached the Donald Cook carried no bombs or missiles but a container with the Khibiny radio-electronic military system. Having approached the destroyer, Khibiny was use to switch off the American destroyer’s radar, battle control circuits and data exchange systems. In other words, it turned off the whole Aegis by remote control. After this, the Su-24 simulated a missile attack at the “blind and deaf” ship, and repeated the maneuver 12 times.

When the Russian fighter left, the Donald Cook rushed to a Romanian port and never approached Russian waters again.

Who will defend America ??

obama cold eyes Not This Guy !

obama silly

Posted in Uncategorized

It is unjust when privileged liberal activists get to Alinskyize their targets

obama angerAs President, I Will Defend Americans Against the Moral Bullies’ “fighting for the people against the powerful.” It’s the standard line of the activist. No doubt it’s what the marginalized and dependent classes are looking for in a president.

But if you are a responsible individual you may find that sort of thing insulting. People of the Responsible Self don’t want some community organizer drilling them in a street protest; we just want a government that defends us from enemies foreign and domestic.

Defending against enemies foreign and domestic is what governments are actually supposed to do. But America has another little problem right now. You know what it is. America is suffering from a plague of the liberal moral bullies with nothing better to do than humiliate people that don’t agree with them.

Even as we speak, the indefatigable Michelle Malkin reports that all the best cities now have their own social justice magnet school. Really? America needs to encourage more kids to become social justice activists?

central american obama children gang members

That’s why we need a leader, right now, ready to defend Americans against the social-justice activists.

We need a presidential candidate saying: “As president, I will defend America against the moral bullies.”

When you think about it, it is a scandal that the leaders of the Republican Party appear to be utterly clueless about defending good honest conservatives from the liberal community activists and moral bullies. It’s no less a scandal because, as Alastair Roberts writes, the “empowered and privileged” activist getting outraged on behalf of people “supposed to be offended” is doing the easiest job in the world.

There are few people more zealous in offence-taking and outrage-making than persons doing so on behalf of the ‘subject supposed to be offended’… Such persons regard themselves as sensitive and caring protectors of the weak and oppressed. Offence-taking and outrage-making is not a mere prerogative for them, but is a noble duty and calling. The more of an outrage they create on others’ behalf, the more virtuous they feel.

I’ve written about all this at great length here.

Obama rallied blood thirsty Muslims while a U.S. paid Senator for cousin o

Here is the very cesspool of injustice. In the sixth year of the Obama Dynasty it’s open season for the social justice activist and the moral bully. She can stigmatize her opponents with the liberal pejorative du jour any time she wants, because social justice. If President Obama doesn’t have her back, she can be sure that Eric “Proud to be an activist” Holder will be there for her. That’s outrageous, because, per Roberts, the activist in question is usually way more privileged and powerful than the target of the pejorative.

In America today It is unjust when privileged liberal activists get to Alinskyize their targets, and freeze, personalize, and polarize them. It’s unjust unless their targets are truly powerful people. Which probably means they are liberals with a smartphone full of powerful contacts and a get-out-of-jail-free app.


When President Obama took the side of a powerful African American professor against a powerless policeman just doing his job, he was acting like a moral bully. When President Obama took the side of powerful race-card activists in the Trayvon Martin case against a powerless “white Hispanic” he was acting like a moral bully.

And America cannot be true to its founding and its promise so long as it cowers before the liberal moral bullies. To quote a prominent American: It’s just not who we are.

All I want in 2016 is a Republican presidential nominee with the courage and the moxie to say “I will defend ordinary Americans against the moral bullies.” And then do it. Again and again.

Perhaps in some presidential exploratory committee at this very moment, some young staffer — that one day will be a household name – is working out the operational plan and the detailed tactics of how to do this: how to stick it to the liberal moral bullies and how to make them cringe in shame, and rout them out of the moral high ground forever.

Then America can come together again, and start to build trust again, and start to celebrate freedom again, all over the world.

Hillary more of the same

Christopher Chantrill @chrischantrill runs the go-to site on US government finances, Also see his American Manifesto and get his Road to the Middle Class.

Read more: Follow us: @AmericanThinker on Twitter | AmericanThinker on Facebook

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged ,

President Obama actually threatened to shoot down Israeli war planes if they attacked Iran to stop its nuclear program

obama muslim flag

In a report that’s likely sending shockwaves through the region, Middle Eastern news agencies are picking up a Kuwaiti newspaper’s report that President Obama actually threatened to shoot down Israeli war planes if they attacked Iran to stop its nuclear program.

Al-Jarida, an independent newspaper owned by a former president of the Kuwaiti parliament, reported that the Israeli government had made plans to attack Iran because it suspected the Obama administration had reached an agreement with the ayatollahs, according to the Israeli news site Arutz Shiva. Citing “well-placed sources,” Al-Jarida reported that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his top advisors had decided take military action, if necessary, to stop Iran from acquiring a nuclear weapon. The Israelis had not only developed a plan, but even engaged in experimental flights to make sure they could elude Iranian radar defenses, the report said.

However, the report said, an Israeli minister told Secretary of State John Kerry about the plan and President Obama threatened to shoot down the Israeli plans before they could reach Iran. The planes would have to cross Iraq to reach Iran from Israel.

Unbelievable as a U.S. strike on Israeli planes might be, if the report is true, it wouldn’t be the first time it’s been suggested in high circles, according to the Daily Caller.

In 2008, Zbigniew Brzezinski who was national security advisor to President Jimmy Carter and campaigned for Obama, told the Daily Beast in an interview that the U.S. military could stop any Israeli attack on Iran.

“They have to fly over our airspace in Iraq,” he said at the time. “Are we just going to sit there and watch?”

Brzezinski Call’s The Shots; Obama’s job Is Simply To Sell Them To The People.
Read more:

Posted in Politics | Tagged , , , ,